A Tale of Two Vehicles
Denver, Colorado
As I stated last week
in my first post on this new blog, I want to explore ways in which we can do
something about the climate crisis as individuals. I’m going to start out by getting really
personal – looking at the vehicles we drive.
For some of us, the choice of a vehicle ranks up there with the choice
of romantic partners, particularly with younger guys. So I realize I’m on slippery footing here and
may piss you off by messing around in your garage.
At first glance, it seems like we could go a long way toward addressing the climate crisis if we all just switched immediately from gasoline (or diesel) powered vehicles to electrics (EVs). But I’m afraid it’s not that simple.
Is this the answer to the climate crisis? Well, maybe not exactly.
Photo source: https://performancedrive.com.au/2016-tesla-model-s-facelift-revealed-updated-design-1309/
Those people who have
given much thought as to what to do about their gas-guzzlers (and face it, we’re
all guzzling whether our vehicles get 10 mpg or 50), are probably concerned
about the impacts of driving on the climate crisis. They would like to do the “right thing” but
are facing some dilemmas. Let me present
a couple friends who typify the problems faced by those of us who give a damn
about the future of our planet.
First, there’s my friend, Dan, who purchased a new Toyota Camry Hybrid sedan in 2014. He felt he was being a good guy by buying a hybrid that gets 40 mpg (it’s not a plug-in which was not available from Toyota at the time). It’s a nice, comfortable car which now has close to 75,000 miles on the odometer. It got him to work every day before he retired and now gets him around town and up to the Colorado mountains on a regular basis. Dan doesn’t take many long trips – occasionally to southwestern Colorado or northern California to see family.
Does Dan plan to trade in his 9-year-old Camry on an EV soon? No way – he’s thrifty and says he will drive his Camry until it dies or until he does. For one thing, a new EV would be expensive and he sees no reason to shell out money when he has a good car that has had no repair or maintenance issues.
Beyond the expense of a new car, were Dan to trade in his Camry, someone else would buy it and continue driving it so it’s not as if it would stop emitting greenhouse gases. Plus, consider the environmental impacts of producing the new EV that Dan would buy. The manufacturing process would take lots of energy (probably generated from carbon-based sources) and raw materials. The latter would include lithium, cobalt, and nickel for the battery which have significant environmental impacts on the areas where they are mined.
The second example involves my friends, Chris and “Zerlinacat” (obviously an alias!), a couple that owns a 1999 Toyota Forerunner 4-wheel-drive SUV. The ol’ beast has logged nearly 400,000 miles for them including on bad roads in the Colorado mountains and in Utah canyon country. They used to use it for work; now they take long trips to Arizona and back in the winter. The Forerunner has had no problems except for a recent $3000 replacement of their cooling system brought on by a loose radiator cap. Currently, it has a slow oil leak.
This couple recognizes that their old friend will have to be replaced sooner rather than later but hope to get a couple more years out of her (I mean “him” – they gave it a man’s name), if possible. Why not just replace him now? Well, first of all, they strongly prefer holding off until the vehicle “is beyond repair because of the resources used in manufacturing” a new one. Furthermore, their “dream vehicle” doesn’t exist yet, at least not at a reasonable price for a middle class couple. They don’t want to shell out $100,000 for what’s currently available and thus, they will wait until a 4-wheel-drive, high clearance, SUV with adequate cargo space is available in the range of $50-60,000. The $7500 rebate for new EVs under the Federal Inflation Reduction Act (subject to several conditions) and a $5000 Colorado state income tax credit will certainly help.
I asked Chris if they would consider buying a plug-in hybrid vehicle that meets their other requirements. After all, it would eliminate any concerns they might have about “range-anxiety” on longer trips. He pointed out that battery ranges keep increasing with Toyota now promising a new battery that will get 700 miles on a charge. Therefore, why buy a plug-in hybrid when it will be old technology in a few years?
Judy & I in May 2013 with our new Toyota FJ Cruiser. I needed it for work and play and there was
no electric or hybrid 4-wheel drive, high-clearance vehicle available at the
time. It’s been a great machine but, man,
does it suck up gas. Most of the time it
stays in the garage and we drive our 2014 Prius hybrid station wagon (not a
plug-in) if possible.
I think these friends' situations illustrate the problems faced by millions of environmentally-conscious drivers when it comes to reducing their carbon footprint. Unfortunately, there is no “free lunch” when it comes to our vehicles. But here, in summary, are a few ideas for you to consider:
- Drive your vehicle into the ground even if it’s a gas-hog. You will have a less than ideal carbon footprint but at least you won’t be buying a new electric vehicle that will have impacts resulting from its manufacture and its components. And a couple or ten years down the road when you do buy an EV, maybe the manufacture of some of the components, especially the battery, will have less of an impact on the environment.
- If you do need a new vehicle right now or soon, avoid buying one powered by an internal combustion engine if you possibly can. An exception would be a plug-in hybrid that would provide enough battery range for commuting and in-town driving presumably only using gasoline on longer trips. Plug-in hybrids seem like a reasonable compromise in 2023.
Maybe you can’t afford a new EV, the battery range is insufficient for the long-distance driving you do, or the model you need is not available yet as an EV. In that case, consider buying a late model gasoline-powered used car or truck which will get you by for a few years until the right EV comes along at a price you can afford.
- Drive less and use public transport if possible. That may be easier said than done. We all have lives and oftentimes our lives involve getting out of our immediate neighborhood for a variety of reasonable purposes. As for public transport, it’s great when it’s on-time, not uncomfortably crowded, and gets you easily where you need to go without long-wait times between transfers. However, it’s often a big, slow, uncomfortable pain in the ass.
I use public transport when I can take a direct bus or train to a destination where parking is a challenge. For example, I try to avoid driving the 25 miles to Denver International Airport. Luckily for me, there is an express bus that gets me from a station about 3 miles from my house to the airport in about as much time as it would take me to drive, costs only $5.25 for a senior, and I don’t have to worry about the expensive airport parking fees. So, my recommendation is to look for opportunities like this where you can avoid driving.
- Bicycling and e-bikes. More power to you if you want to go this route but I’ll give it a miss. I’m not about to take my life in my hands bicycling on city streets (except maybe in a quiet residential area for exercise). About 15 years ago, I borrowed a friend’s bike for “Bike to Work Day” and rode 8 miles to my office and back. I was almost broadsided twice by drivers who didn’t see me. It was a nail-biting experience.
- Can you live close to where you work? Nearly 50 years ago, my now ex-wife and I commuted by train and on foot from a northwest suburb of Boston to our jobs near the center of the city. We spent a minimum of three hours a day commuting. It would have been just as bad by car but many of our colleagues did it year after year like lemmings. I swore I would never again subject myself to a long commute and I haven’t. My partner, Judy, and I intentionally bought our current home 29 years ago about half-way between our two offices in southeast Denver. Yes, people change jobs but it sure saves on stress and is a heck of a lot better for the environment when you can drive to your office in say, 15 minutes.
I hope I’ve given you a few ideas to chew over. I’m sure you have additional ideas and experiences you’d like to share on this subject. Well, have at it! Post your comments below or send me an email at wbmahoney@gmail.com.
I drive a Honda Fit, which I bought used and will drive until it dies.
ReplyDeleteSometime during the next two weeks, I will be reviewing a programmatic Environmental Assessment for a pilot program for the installation of EV charge facilities at multiple Air Force bases. The Air Force plans to convert their fleet of light-duty vehicles to EVs by 2027. There are several Tesla fans on base that are disappointed they can’t charge their POVs while at work.
One thing I don’t understand is how the energy used balances out with greenhouse gas (GHG) emitted from vehicles vs GHG emitted from power plants producing the electricity delivered to an EV charge facility. I think natural gas fired plants are cleaner, but I don’t really know.
A recent article in Forbes Magazine addressed your question: https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikescott/2020/03/30/yes-electric-cars-are-cleaner-even-when-the-power-comes-from-coal/?sh=25b303fa2320. The Forbes article said that a "new study by the universities of Exeter and Cambridge in the UK and Nijmegen in the Netherlands has concluded that electric cars lead to lower carbon emissions overall, even if electricity generation still relies on fossil fuels. The results are reported in the journal Nature Sustainability."
DeleteCaught my attention, so I read it. Interesting and relatable. A few thoughts - cost of fuel is also a consideration. Even at $5+ a gallon for gasoline, I think electricity is more expensive here in California. Another point is measuring the gas auto’s impact on the climate compared to other factors…what percentage do gas-powered cars contribute to the climate problem?
ReplyDeleteAt some point you’ll want to define the overall issue…is it global warming, holes in the ozone, eliminating the rain forest, killing off the animals and creatures of the seas? All the above?
Even the nonbelievers can see and feel the effects of global warming.
Rich
Southern California
Rich raises a couple of interesting points that I’ll try to address.
DeleteClimate scientists generally agree that the emission of so called “greenhouse gases” by human activities are responsible for climate change. Carbon dioxide (CO2) accounts for nearly 80% of greenhouse gases emitted in the US (the remaining 20% come from methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases.) The most significant source of CO2 according to the EPA (https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases) is transportation (35%) followed by generation of electricity (31%), industry (15%), and residential (11%). Transportation includes passenger vehicles, trucks, air travel, marine transportation, and rail. The EPA website I looked at does not break down the percentages of emissions for each form of transportation but I suspect that some digging on the internet would reveal those numbers.
Rich says I’ll “want to define the overall issue…is it global warming, holes in the ozone, eliminating the rain forest, killing off the animals and creatures of the seas? All the above?”
The issue that I’m focusing on is the climate crisis (aka global warming or climate change). The other issues you mention include holes in the ozone layer of the atmosphere. This problem has been greatly reduced over the past 20 years with the elimination of the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and related gases in refrigeration and air conditioning.
Rain forest destruction in the Amazon, the Congo Basin, and Indonesia is a major contributor to climate change because of the important role these forests play in reducing CO2 in the atmosphere by photosynthesis which uses sunlight, CO2 and water and releases oxygen.
Climate change is having a huge impact on plant and animal life, both terrestrial and marine. The temperature increases have been so rapid in some areas that flora and fauna are unable to adapt or migrate fast enough to prevent their extinction. The recently-reported die-off of coral in the Florida Keys is just one notable example.
Thanks, Will. That's a good point, like having a balanced budget (something the government will never do). We attack the problem from both ends, reduce CO2 emissions and plant more trees that convert CO2 to oxygen (and stop destroying the rainforest). That would improve life on this planet for all God's creatures in the sea and on the land.
DeleteRich
Southern California
Quite interesting and well-balanced, Will. The only thing that I don’t think is directly addressed is the severe ozone problem we have on the Colorado Front Range which our fossil-fuel autos contribute greatly to. Outdone by the Suncor Refinery and other smoke-belching plants, I believe, but still problematic enough to get the EPA’s attention as well as the pulmonary wards in hospitals….Better visually, at least, than in the old leaded-gas-days when we could see the brown cloud, but still an issue. I love my first-world life for however long our planet stays almost habitable for our specie and lifestyle!
ReplyDeleteJean
Boulder, Colorado
Enjoyed your "garage" blog story. I have two vehicles- A Toyota 4-runner 2001 model that I drive in the back country. It is a reliable friend that has always preformed. It sits in my driveway and has never known a garage.
ReplyDeleteA Tesla Y lives in the garage. I put solar on top of my house 2 years ago- makes great electricity. I just plug the car into the garage outlet when it needs a charge.
I won't replace the Toyota when it gives up although I suspect it will keep going for many years.
Beau
Santa Fe, New Mexico
All very depressing really. We drive a Kia Niro plug-in with a 55km battery range. We've had it for 3 years and have done 10000km (about 6000 miles). It's the most over-serviced vehicle I've ever owned! I guess the real answer is to drive less, insulate the house, and consume less of everything.
ReplyDeleteI attach a short video I made which you are free to use in your blog if you want: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=ea008035db&attid=0.1&permmsgid=msg-f:1773500525964178092&th=189cbd54fb1032ac&view=att&disp=safe&realattid=f_lkzp7wrl1
Take care, and carry on with your good work!
Hugh
Dublin, IRELAND
Thanks for publishing this series. EVs present some promises but also unforeseen problems. One issue is the increased weight of the vehicles, which require more energy to move. Additionally, the extra weight also makes an accident with an EV more likely to produce life threatening injuries.
ReplyDeleteIt's not always easy being green. We got a plug in and we use it on battery over 90% of the time. The biggest eco saving is that we've only done about 6000 miles in 3 years. In Ireland us over-65's get a free travel pass, so we tend to do longer trips by choo-choo! We're lucky we have good public transport, but it's more difficult if one lives in the countryside.
ReplyDeleteHere is a link to an article on the challenges of converting to electric cars in Europe: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/aug/26/europe-roadblocks-race-switch-electric-cars-evs-zero-emission-goal
Hugh
Dublin, IRELAND
Bye bye oil and gas in transportation: "Toyota’s New Battery Tech Achieves 932-Mile Range in Only 10 Minutes of Charging" Not immediately available, but could be on its way.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.vehiclesuggest.com/toyota-new-battery-tech-achieves-932-mile-range-in-10-minutes-of-charging/
Marc
Denver
Wow, Marc. That's terrific and points to a whole new ballgame for future auto production. Too bad we'll still be stuck with all the vehicles currently on the road that have internal combustion engines.
Delete